-
I think distance/energy unit is flawed since there are two energy sources now: gas/diesel and electricity. It would be easier to start with energy/distance and then provide a chart – similar to how they simplify MPG now with city/highway.
For instance, energy/100 Miles might look like this:
city: 1 Kw + .75 Gal (more electricity)
highway: .5 Kw + 1.5 Gal (more gas)It’s up to the reader to determine how they would drive the vehicle.
-
To say 230mpg just confuses consumers who don’t know any better. There should be two numbers for REEVs (or EREVs):
- all electric range
- mpg in charge sustaining modeI think the appropriate response is ridicule. GM and the EPA should be shamed into using more honest metrics. Wish the MSM had a basic understanding of this stuff.

2 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://www.goodgreencars.com/2009/10/what-should-an-ev-mpg-rating-look-like/trackback/