What Should an EV MPG Rating Look Like?

The Environmental Protection Agency has been working diligently on a new system to rate the fuel efficiency of alternative-fuel vehicles. It’s turned out to be tricky, as the dust-up over GM’s claims of 230 mpg for the Chevy Volt and Nissan’s follow-up claims of 367 mpg for its electric leaf showed up this summer.

While the EPA is working this out, the New York Times “Wheels” blog asked a few folks in the know what they thought the fuel economy rating should look like on the window sticker. A few of their suggestions are below; what would you the potential alt-fuel buyer like to see? Tell us in the comments.

  • ETV Motors of Israel wants three pieces of information: the all-electric range, the electric efficiency in miles per 10 kW hours, and gasoline fuel efficiency for plug-in hybrids
  • Think! of Norway wants to measure energy usage during a standard driving cycle, maybe with a star rating
  • Coda Automotive prefers to see the battery range and a statement about the car’s emissions-free status

Tags: , , ,

  1. David’s avatar

    I think distance/energy unit is flawed since there are two energy sources now: gas/diesel and electricity. It would be easier to start with energy/distance and then provide a chart – similar to how they simplify MPG now with city/highway.

    For instance, energy/100 Miles might look like this:

    city: 1 Kw + .75 Gal (more electricity)
    highway: .5 Kw + 1.5 Gal (more gas)

    It’s up to the reader to determine how they would drive the vehicle.

  2. japanese engines’s avatar

    To say 230mpg just confuses consumers who don’t know any better. There should be two numbers for REEVs (or EREVs):

    - all electric range
    - mpg in charge sustaining mode

    I think the appropriate response is ridicule. GM and the EPA should be shamed into using more honest metrics. Wish the MSM had a basic understanding of this stuff.